Legal Opinion

South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & Tourism v. Brookgreen Gardens

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1992No. 23729PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice;

This case arises from a petition for original jurisdiction which was granted by the court pursuant to Rule 229, SCACR, dated March 25,1992. The petition requests declaratory relief, based on the public interest and emergency conditions which exist, to determine the respective rights of the parties in property comprising what is now known as Huntington Beach State Park. We hold that Brookgreen Gardens (Brookgreen) possesses the title to the land in fee simple absolute.

FACTS

The parties are in essential agreement on the facts. In 1931, Archer M. Huntington and his wife Anna Hyatt…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Leasing Enterprises, Inc. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Purvis v. McElveenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Burnett v. SnoddySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. County of Abbeville v. KnoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DuRant v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Wellin v. WellinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  3. Green Tree Servicing, LLC Ex Rel. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API