Legal Opinion

De Saussure v. Hall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion

*165On Petition to Rehear

2Opinion of the CourtJustice SwepstoN

In this case we concurred in the result of the opinion of the Court of Appeals hut denied certiorari. We now have this petition to rehear on behalf of Dr. De Saussure in which it is stated that in view of the fact that this case will have to be retried, there are certain questions of admissibility of evidence which this Court should decide for guidance on the retrial of the case.

In view of the fact that this Court did not take jurisdiction of the matter, nny opinion that we might express would be an advisory opinion which we are not authorized to give. Crane Enamelware…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crane Enamelware Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. KENDALL OIL COMPANY v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union Planters Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. De Saussure v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Veach v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Veach v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API