Legal Opinion
De Saussure v. Hall
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
297 S.W.2d 90 (1956)
Dr. Richard L. DE SAUSSURE
v.
Janice C. HALL, Executrix, etc.
Supreme Court of Tennessee.
December 7, 1956.
John S. Porter, Burch, Porter & Johnson, Memphis, for Dr. Richard L. De Saussure.
Wils Davis and L.E. Gwinn, Memphis, for Janice C. Hall.
On Petition to Rehear
SWEPSTON, Justice.
In this case we concurred in the result of the opinion of the Court of Appeals but denied certiorari. We now have this petition to rehear on behalf of Dr. De Saussure in which it is stated that in view of the fact that this case will have to be retried, there are certain questions of admissibility of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crane Enamelware Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- KENDALL OIL COMPANY v. PayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- De Saussure v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Union Planters Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Veach v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Veach v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1973