Legal Opinion
Charles E. Larsen v. James K. Frazier Attorney General, State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1987No. 87-1280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.-2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Petitioner appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2254. We affirm.
In November, 1980, petitioner pled guilty to and was convicted of burglary pursuant to a plea bargain. In January, 1984, he was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- James Edward Ewing v. Harvey WinansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Richard D. Tyrrell v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- David Leon Cummings v. Edward Evans, Warden Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Rollings v. Thermodyne Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Cummings v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- James Butler Scales v. Dan M. Reynolds the Attorney General of the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.