Shay v. Byars

In this action, the trial court

granted summary disposition in favor of defendant JohnKal, Inc., on the basis that plaintiffs had failed to comply with the name and retain provisions of the dramshop act. MCL 436.22(5); MSA 18.993(5). The order did not, however, state under which rule summary disposition was being granted. Subsequently, the claims against the remaining parties were settled and the action dismissed. Plaintiffs now appeal, challenging the order of summary disposition in favor of defendant JohnKal. We affirm.

This action arises out of a four-car accident that occurred on September…