Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Final order reversed upon the law and the facts. While this proceeding appears to have been properly brought under article 5, section 20, of the Zoning Law (People ex rel. Smith v. Walsh, 211 App. Div. 205; affd., by the Court of Appeals, 240 N. Y. 606; People ex rel. Small v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 883), we are not satisfied from the record before us that practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships have been shown sufficently to justify the order of the board of appeals. We, therefore, remit the proceeding to the Special Term to take testimony and determine the question as to whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Smith v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. People Ex Rel. Smith v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. People ex rel. Small v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sena v. GallagherNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Whitton v. Town of BallstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API