Legal Opinion

Tolbert v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about January 8, 1998, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied on the ground that triable issues of fact exist bearing upon whether defendants breached their duty to provide plaintiff with a safe place to alight, including whether defendants knew or should have known of the street pothole that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall (see, Blye v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rodriguez v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Keener v. TiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malawer v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Ryals v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Raines v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Raines v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API