Legal Opinion

United States v. McNeil

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1952No. 1237PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellee was charged by information with the crime of petit larceny. Before arraignment, according to the statement of proceedings and evidence, .appellee’s counsel “orally requested the Court tó entertain a -motion to quash the arrest and to suppress the evidence.” Thereupon officer Fielder was called to the witness stand and testified that appellee was arrested without a warrant. The circumstances of the arrest were that the witness and a fellow officer, both in plain-clothes and driving an unlettered police car, were driving south on Tenth Street when they saw…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. United States v. BlokCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Selman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. District of Columbia v. PerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re McDonaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Dobkin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API