Legal Opinion
Allen W. Hinkel Dry Goods Co. v. Wichison Industrial Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1933No. 789PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The Gas Company brought this suit to enjoin the Dry Goods Company from violating a contract for the purchase of gas. The bill, after setting out the requisite jurisdictional facts, alleged: That on January 7, 1925, C. L. Bullock and the Dry Goods Company entered into a contract by which Bullock agreed to provide a pipeline from certain gas fields in Kay and Grant Counties, Oklahoma, to Wichita, Kansas, of sufficient size to supply the Dry Goods Company and other consumers with gas, and a distributing line from such pipeline to the property line of the Dry Goods…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Alabama v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. City of South HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Vaughan v. John C. Winston Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Mobile Gas Service Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Co., IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Fields v. Anderson Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.