Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Arkellian

United States District Court

Decided June 26, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Siberman, D. C. J.

This is an action at law instituted by the plaintiff, Milton Kaplan, against the defendant, Mardich Arkellian, to recover damages in pursuance to section 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 194.2, 50 U. 8. G. A. Appendix, § 925 (e). The facts as set forth in the state of demand allege that, on or about September 14th, 1940, the defendant rented to the plaintiff under a month to month tenancy, certain housing accommodations at an agreed monthly rental of $30; that for the month of August, 1942, the defendant landlord demanded and received from the *210plaintiff the sum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Everly v. ZeppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Denison v. TockerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API