Legal Opinion
Denison v. Tocker
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1951No. 5336PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Chief Justice.
This is a suit for $2014.95 plus a reasonable attorney’s fees and costs on account of overcharges for rent, based upon Section 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1895, which so far as this case is concerned, provides : “Any person who demands, accepts, or receives any payment of rent in excess of the maximum rent prescribed under section 204 shall be liable to the person from whom he demands, accepts, or receives such payment (or shall be liable to the United States as hereinafter provided), for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Porter v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Adler v. Northern Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Kinzua Lumber Co. v. DaggettOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. WibergNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Foy v. Austin Capital Mgmt., Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.