Carmichael v. Government of the Virgin Islands
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(November 29, 2004)
The appellant challenges her conviction below and asserts the following grounds for relief:
1) The court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal based on a material variance in the Information and the evidence adduced at trial; and
2) The court erred in denying her motion for new trial on grounds evidence of payments she made in restitution to her employer should have been excluded as a compromise offer to settle a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408.
For the reasons which follow, we affirm the appellant’s conviction.1
*394I. STATEMENT OF…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BrewleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2007
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Adams-TuteinDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2005