Legal Opinion
Cromer v. Mullally
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 24, 2003No. 3D03-1107PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
861 So.2d 523 (2003)
Freddy CROMER, Appellant,
v.
Pierce H. MULLALLY, Esq., and Pierce H. Mullally, Esq., P.A., Appellees.
No. 3D03-1107.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 24, 2003.
Stabinski & Funt, Miami, and Daniel M. Grissom, for appellant.
Louis F. Robinson, III (North Palm Beach), for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
2Per curiam
Freddy Cromer ("Cromer") appeals the trial court's order granting Pierce Mullally and Pierce Mullally, P.A.'s (hereafter collectively referred to as "Mullally") motion to strike Cromer's complaint as sham. We reverse.
In October of 1999,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Meadows v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Menke v. Southland Specialties Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- St. John Medical Plans, Inc. v. PHYSICIAN CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
4Cited by8 opinions
- MORTGAGE ELECT. REGISTRATION v. RevoredoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Upland Development of Central Florida, Inc. v. BridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Herranz v. SiamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Sunex International Inc. v. ColsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Wildflower, LLC v. St. Johns River Water Management DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.