Legal Opinion

Doughnut MacH. Corporation v. Joe-Lowe Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1933No. 3487PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal in a suit brought to enjoin infringement of patent No. 1,702,191, issued February 12, 1929, on application filed by one J. C. Bergner October 13, 1919. Defendants, in addition to denying infringement, pleaded that the patent was void on grounds of anticipation and lack of invention. The judge below held that, in view of the prior art, it must be held limited to the particular mechanism described in the specification and drawings, and that, as so limited, it was not infringed by the defendants. From decree in accordance with this holding, complainant has…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Denominational Envelope Co. v. Duplex Envelope Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Inc. v. O. M. Franklin Blackleg Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Maibohm v. RCA Victor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  4. Connecticut Paper Products, Inc. v. New York Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Goldman v. PolanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API