Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2007No. 06-14PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[11] Appellant, Shane Sanderson, appeals his conviction for one count of immodest, immoral, or indecent acts with a child ("indecent liberties"), and two counts of felony child abuse. He argues that the trial court improperly admitted character evidence against him, that the indecent lHberties statute is unconstitutional as applied to his conduct, that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial, and that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his child abuse convictions. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] We rephrase the issues as follows:

1. Was improper character evidence…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rivera v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Valerio v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Large v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. OPERATION SAVE AMERICA v. City of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API