Legal Opinion

Paternoster v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 22, 2009No. 2:08-cv-388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the following sets of filings:(1) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. #32), Defendant’s memorandum in opposition (Doc. # 35), and Plaintiffs reply memorandum (Doc. # 37); and(2) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 33), Plaintiffs memorandum in opposition (Doc. # 34), and Defendant’s reply memorandum (Doc. # 36).

For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. #32) and GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 33).

I.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LongDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  2. United States v. BarczykDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. United States v. LaFevre Construction, LLC (TV2)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API