Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 2016No. AC37738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

*736 The petitioner, Steven Sewell, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erred by concluding that his trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance. The petitioner claims that his trial counsel failed to adequately investigate the state's witnesses and prepare for trial, and as a result, he was prejudiced.

*737 We disagree with the petitioner and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

In deciding the petitioner's direct appeal of his conviction, this court summarized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Diaz v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. SewellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Hamlin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carrasquillo v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Sewell v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API