Legal Opinion

Burrows ex rel. Burrows v. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1989No. 88-3703PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

This is a class action for injunctive relief invoking the first and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 36 U.S.C. § 371 et seq. Plaintiffs-appellants David Burrows, Kyle Hetman, and Oreluwa Mahoney were students who attended high schools in Montgomery County, Ohio, and who were members of their respective public, parochial, and private high schools’ interscholastic soccer teams. They purportedly represented a class of approximately 15,000 high school students in Ohio who actively participated in interscholastic and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horner v. Kentucky High School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary Schools Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998
  3. David Burrows v. Ohio High School Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. PI Lambda Phi Fraternity, Inc. v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Miami University Wrestling Club v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API