State v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Washington District Court. — Hoar. D. RyaN, Judge. The defendant was convicted, and fined one hundred dollars, for knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully receiving, for the purpose of delivering to another, certain intoxicating liquors, which were being, as it is alleged, unlawfully conveyed in this state. He appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
I. The defendant was arrested upon an information charging that he was the agent of the Burlington & Western Railway Company at Brighton,Iowa, and that on August 6, 1891, as such agent, he “did knowingly, willfully, and unlawfully receive, for the purpose of delivering to another, certain intoxicating liquor that was being unlawfully transported or *497conveyed from Burlington, Iowa, to Brighton, Iowa, viz., one box containing a two-gallon jug, and said jug being full of whisky, alcohol, or other intoxicating liquor; said box being marked ‘W. H., Brighton, Iowa,’ and not plainly or correctly…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Kizer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. ArlunoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- State v. Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- People v. BootmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.