Ponzi v. Ponzi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
In the first cause of action herein, for separate maintenance, it was alleged that the parties were married in the city of Quartzsite, Arizona, on February 26, 1950; in the second cause of action that they were married during the month of May, 1951, by common law in Tulsa, Oklahoma; and in the third cause of action that they were married by common law in May and June, 1951, in the state of Texas. Inability of plaintiff to support herself was alleged in each cause of action and attorney’s fees, costs and an allowance for support were sought. It was further alleged that the parties entered into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. BinkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Beach v. ArblasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961