Cincinnati v. Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co.

The plaintiff alleges that it “ has an estate in and is entitled to the possession of parts of Vine and Walnut streets * * * extending from the south line of Water street * * * to low water mark on the the north side of the Ohio river,” and that defendants “ wrongfully and unlawfully obstruct said portion of said streets by occupying the same with wharves or landings and deriving a revenue therefrom to the great and irreparable damage and injury of this plaintiff, for which it has no adequate remedy at law,” the prayer of the petition being for an injunction. '

These allegations and the…