Legal Opinion

Brown v. Timmany

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1851PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the court of common pleas of Athens county. Reserved for decision in this court by. the Supreme Court in that county.

Read the full summary

Error to the court of common pleas of Athens county. Reserved for decision in this court by. the Supreme Court in that county. The action was assumpsit, commenced originally before a justice of the peace, by whose judgment the plaintiff recovered six dollars damages, and costs of suit, on April 11, 1850. The defendant appealed to the court of common pleas, where the cause, after sundry continuances, was tried by a jury, at the September term, 1851. Under the charge of the court, the jury returned a verdict for defendant. The bill of exceptions shows that the plaintiff and defendant made an…

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

In Sellers v. Dugan, 18 Ohio, 493, this court, with one dissenting voice, decided that an ordinary contract, made in the course of business, on a Sunday, is void, and that no action can be sustained to recover damages for the breach of such a contract.

The question whether money paid on the contract could be recovered back in the action of assumpsit, was not submitted, much loss determined, in that suit.

*The question is directly presented for adjudication in the case at bar, and we have no hesitation in saying that the court of common pleas erred in its instructions to the jury.

We have…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  3. Metcalf v. HartWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Maddox, Exr. v. ReserOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Cincinnati v. Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co.Hamilton Circuit Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API