Eisenmann v. Tester
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WILLIAMS, J.
It is now contended that this court should enter final judgment for1 plaintiff in error and that if this is not done, the judgment should be reversed because the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. These contentions of plaintiff in error are unfounded. The cause was properly submitted to the jury and we can not disturb the verdict on the ground that it is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.
It is contended that the court erred with reference to rulings on the admission of evidence regarding a rule of the Director of Public Safety prohibiting…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Columbus v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
- Fritz v. New York Central RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- State, Ex Rel. Nicholson v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.