Legal Opinion

People v. Perkell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 14, 1998No. 98SA436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this reciprocal discipline proceeding under C.R.C.P. 241.17, the respondent, Mark R. Perkell, and the assistant disciplinary counsel executed a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommends that Perkell be publicly censured in Colorado following his reprimand in Connecticut for faffing to file a federal income tax return. An inquiry panel of the grievance committee approved the conditional admission. We accept the conditional admission and publicly censure the respondent.

I

Mark R. Perkell was licensed to practice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MattoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. BorchardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. TaugerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WoodfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API