Legal Opinion

People v. Mattox

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1993No. 93SA249PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney discipline proceeding is brought pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.17(d) (discipline imposed by a foreign jurisdiction). A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of the hearing board and recommended that the respondent 1 be suspended from the practice of law for one year and pay the costs of the proceeding. Neither the respondent nor the assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the hearing panel’s action. We approve the recommendation of the hearing panel.

I

The hearing board found that the following facts had been established by clear and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MattoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Kentucky State Bar Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
  3. People v. TrevinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. BreinganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. CalderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. NorthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. People v. KielySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API