Legal Opinion

DC Electronics, Inc. v. Employers Modern Life Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 5, 1980No. 79-1946PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether an insurance company (defendant Employers Modern Life Company (“Employers”)) is required by law to notify the owner of an insurance policy (plaintiff DC Electronics, Inc. (“DC”)) on the life of the owner’s employee (Donald J. Barrett (“Barrett”)) that the five-year term contract of insurance was about to expire and a premium was due in order to exercise an option to renew the existing policy or convert it into a new policy. We answer this question in the affirmative. We reverse the trial court’s decision to deny DC’s and Merchant’s 1…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Schmidt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Shiaras v. ChuppIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Knapp v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. National Fidelity Life Insurance Co. v. Joan KaraganisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Cummins v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fox v. HeimannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Bellmer v. Charter Security Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Clarin Corporation v. Massachusetts General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API