Legal Opinion

Garrety v. Cottman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1934No. 31,420PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants, who constitute the board of trustees of the Wichita firemen’s pension fund, to compel them to take official action to place him on the retired list of firemen and to grant him a pension on account of alleged injuries received in the line of duty which permanently incapacitated him from further service in his vocation.

To the alternative writ of mandamus issued at the instance of plaintiff, defendants filed a motion to quash on two grounds:

“First: For the reason that said alternative writ, on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Mid-West Photo Play Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Board Trustees Firemen's Pension Fund v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Cities Service Co. v. KoenekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Penquite v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Godlove v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API