State v. Etienne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDalianis, C.J.
Because I believe that the trial court erred in instructing the jury regarding the amount of force the defendant was permitted to use in self-defense or defense of others, I respectfully dissent from Part 11(A) of the majority’s thoughtful opinion. I concur, however, in the remainder of the opinion.
The trial court instructed the jury, in pertinent part, as follows:
The defendant must reasonably believe that the amount of force he used was necessary for self-defense or defense of others. A person is not permitted to use excessive force in self-defense, only a reasonable amount of force. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PuglieseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. Elementis Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. McKeownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.