Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Saunders

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1978No. 181 and 255PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

The present appeals have been taken by the Commonwealth from a pre-trial order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. By such order the trial court refused to consolidate, in a single trial, certain criminal charges lodged against a defendant. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the order is interlocutory in nature and that the appeals must therefore be quashed.

Appellee, Darrell Christian Saunders, along with three other youths, was implicated in two purse snatchings which took place in the Pittsburgh area on the afternoon of January 6,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Yohn v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API