Legal Opinion
Condon v. Reno
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1998No. 97-2554PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON joined. Senior Judge PHILLIPS wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
The Attorney General of the State of South Carolina (the State) challenged the constitutionality of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), see 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2721-2725 (West Supp.1998), in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina on the grounds that it violated the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments to the United States Constitution.1 The United *456States defended the DPPA, arguing that…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- David M. Travis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Litman v. George Mason UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.