In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. & State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal contests the validity under the Interstate Commerce Act, and under general equitable principles, of the arbitration clause in an interstate carrier’s standard-form bill of lading utilized in connection with its nationwide business of transporting individually owned automobiles from point to point within the United States. The principal argument is that the arbitration clause is invalid because it compels private shippers to arbitrate their claims in New York, which may be entirely remote, inconvenient and expensive to them in connection with their claims.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Differences Between Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Subrogee of Joseph RomagnoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976