Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cammon v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2000Published

1DissentRosenblatt, J.

We concur with the majority insofar as it holds that maritime law does not preempt *591Labor Law § 200 or § 241 (6). In our view, however, maritime law preempts Labor Law § 240 (1) and we therefore dissent in part.

As a threshold matter, admiralty jurisdiction exists in this case (see, Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 US 527). Plaintiff was injured as he stood on a “float stage” in navigable waters. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was repairing a wood fender system on a pier extending over the East River. The City of New York owned the pier and used it in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API