Gray v. Giannikios
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The summons and complaint purportedly were served upon the defendants Michael Giannikios and Ekaterini Zoumberakis *837(hereinafter together the respondents) by the “nail and mail” method pursuant to CPLR 308 (4). However, the record demonstrates that the service was deficient because the plaintiffs failed “to show the existence of even a factual question as to whether the process server exercised the due diligence necessary to be permitted to serve someone under CPLR 308 (4)” (Leviton v Unger, 56 AD3d 731, 732 [2008]; see Schwarz v Margie, 62 AD3d 780, 781 [2009]). Since the proof of due…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tagliaferri v. WeilerNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wells Fargo Bank v. ChaplinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Estate of Waterman v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Engel v. BoymelgreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington Mutual Bank v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- FV-1, Inc. v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Dupps v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rosemark Contractors, Inc. v. NessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Sileo v. VictorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.