Legal Opinion
In re Hyderally
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This ethics proceeding requires the Court to determine whether respondent, Ty Hyderally, violated Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 8.4(e), which prohibits “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation,” by virtue of his display of the seal of the New Jersey Board on Attorney Certification on his law firm website, notwithstanding the fact That respondent is not a Certified Attorney. An attorney may incorporate the seal of the New *455Jersey Board on Attorney Certification in attorney advertising, including any website, only if he or she is certified as a civil trial attorney,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SeeligSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- In Re MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- In Re ProthroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- In Re StahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- In re TanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Board of Professional Responsibility v. Connie ReguliTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2025
- In Re Opinion No. 745 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2025
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KENNETH PAGLIAROLI(05-03-0335, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017