Legal Opinion

Nungester v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1995No. C-930771PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is taken from the Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissal of claims asserted against the city of Cincinnati, its former safety director, and various members of its police department, and from the Civ.R. 56(B) entry of summary judgment for a department store and five of its employees on the claims separately asserted against them. In their two assignments of error, the plaintiffs-appellants, Larry and Norma Nungester (“Nungester”), raise the following issues: (1) whether, due to sovereign immunity, their complaint failed to state claims upon which relief could be granted against the city…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Culberson v. DoanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. Kammeyer v. City of SharonvilleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  4. Chase v. Brooklyn City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Chesher v. NeyerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API