Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to vacate injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

This is a motion to vacate an injunction heretofore obtained by the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from cutting or interfering with the ice in the Hudson river in front of the plaintiff’s premises and ice house, between the center of the channel of said river and the shore thereof, whereon the plaintiff’s house is located and said premises situated, and around which ice the plaintiff has placed safeguards, pursuant to chapter 388 of the Laws of 1879. The granting of injunctions preventing the cutting or interfering with ice in the Hudson river, tinder the statute above referred to, has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jessup v. . CarnegieNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. People's Ice Co. v. The Steamer "Excelsior."Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Van Rensselaer v. MouldNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hudson River Ice Co. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API