Legal Opinion

State v. Reinart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. Cr. 880262PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Kenneth William Reinart has appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition in violation of § 12.1-20-03(l)(d), N.D.C.C. 1 We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The complainant, Reinart’s stepdaughter, who was fourteen years old when the alleged sexual acts occurred, testified that Reinart had repeatedly engaged in sexual intercourse with her over a period of several months. A physician testified about a physical examination of the complainant:

“A. Okay. My assessment of the scars would be that there was chronic…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. SkaroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sampson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BurgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API