Legal Opinion

United States v. Horton

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2010No. 09-3032PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Thomas Horton appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress. The district court found that police had reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop Horton and that police did not exceed the permissible scope of the stop. Horton entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm as a felon, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

I

On the morning of February 5, 2008, a cab driver arrived at an apartment complex in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to pick up a man later identified as Horton. After waiting ten minutes in front…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. CowanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Anthony BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Robert GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Jeremy TrogdonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API