Manning v. Hague
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The relator is the owner of property known as 107 Tonnele avenue, Jersey City. The building thereon is a two-story frame dwelling-house, which relator desires to alter and coni vert into a store on the first floor and living apartments above. Having made an application for a permit to make such alterations, and the same below denied, she has obtained a rule to show cause why an alternative or peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue to compel the issuance of such permit to her.
The relator employed one George Flagg, an architect, to* prepare sketches of the proposed alterations,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- City of Bismarck v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Spiegle v. Borough of Beach HavenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Rohrs v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926