Legal Opinion

Hofler v. Marion Lumber Company

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided September 16, 1964No. Civ. A. 7411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.

Action instituted by plaintiff to recover $60,239.74 from defendant upon complaint alleging payment of such sum to defendant by bankrupt was fraudulent as. to existing creditors of bankrupt under provisions of Section 67, sub. d(2) (a) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. d(2) (a). The statute relied on provides:

“Every transfer made and every obligation incurred by a debtor within one year prior to the filing of a peti tion initiating a proceeding under this title by or against him is fraudulent (a) as to creditors existing at the time of such transfer or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halsey v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Barr & Creelman Mill & Plumbing Supply Co. v. ZollerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Wagoner, Tr. v. W. Turnbull Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klein v. TabatchnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Ray v. City Bank & Trust Co. (In Re C-L Cartage Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1987
  3. Beemer v. Heller (In Re Holly Hill Medical Center, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1984
  4. Field v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Abatement Environmental Resources, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. Mandel v. ScanlonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API