In Re Best Products Co., Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CONTESTED § 503(b) APPLICATIONS
TINA L. BROZMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Two creditors of Best Products Co., Inc. seek reimbursement for attorneys’ fees which they incurred during the chapter 11 cases. The theory behind the requests by Casio, Inc. (“Casio”) and the Dickstein Group is that they each made a substantial contribution to the cases, as a result of which their professionals are entitled to seek compensation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(4). Best Products Co., Inc. and its affiliates (together, “Best”) successfully reorganized, greatly reducing their debt and distributing all of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re Best Products Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,307 in Re Robert O. Lister, Jr., and Marie Lister, Debtors. John T. Haskins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Richton International Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Alumni Hotel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
- In Re GurleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
- In Re American Preferred Prescription, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Bayou Group, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.