Legal Opinion

Carl's Markets v. De Feo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 12, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

55 So.2d 182 (1951)

CARL's MARKETS, Inc.,

v.

DE FEO et ux.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

February 2, 1951.

On Rehearing October 12, 1951.

Rehearing Denied December 7, 1951.

Dixon, DeJarnette & Bradford, Miami, for appellant.

Hamilton & Langbein, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

ROBERTS, Justice.

The plaintiff Mayme DeFeo, one of the appellees here, slipped on a string bean and fell, while shopping in defendant's self-service grocery store. Thereupon Mrs. DeFeo and her husband filed suit to recover their respective damages for the injuries sustained by Mrs. DeFeo. Verdict was for the plaintiffs, and…

Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wells v. Palm Beach Kennel ClubSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Clyde Bar, Inc. v. McClammaSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Pabst v. Hillman'sAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carls Markets v. MeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Marie E. Pogue and William T. Pogue v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Wimberley v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Patty v. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. Busch v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API