Legal Opinion

Flowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 1977No. 76-995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

351 So.2d 764 (1977)

Nathaniel FLOWERS, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 15, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita G. Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

2Per curiam

Nathaniel Flowers was charged by information with burglary of a dwelling and grand larceny. At trial, a jury found Flowers guilty on the charge of burglary, and not guilty on the charge of grand larceny.…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Johnsen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. Hinton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Lawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API