Legal Opinion
Marshall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 25, 1983No. 82-802PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
439 So.2d 973 (1983)
Herbert MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-802.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 25, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Penny H. Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT, and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
The sole point on appeal is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial where a lab technician testified that the defendant's fingerprints matched those taken from a master file of persons previously booked at the Dade…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- D'ANNA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Staten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Atwood v. HendrixDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Villanueva v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.