State v. Dysart
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
Defendant was found to be a habitual motor vehicle offender following a hearing before the Hillsborough County Superior Court. The trial court ordered defendant not to operate a motor vehicle for six months from the date of its order. This order was later amended to provide for a twelve-month revocation. The State seasonably excepted to the court’s order and the matter was transferred here by Loughlin, C.J.
RSA 262-B:5 IV provides that following a finding that a person is a habitual offender the court shall direct the person not to operate a motor vehicle. The period of revocation is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- State v. BatchelderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984