Legal Opinion

State v. Dysart

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1978No. 78-191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum

Defendant was found to be a habitual motor vehicle offender following a hearing before the Hillsborough County Superior Court. The trial court ordered defendant not to operate a motor vehicle for six months from the date of its order. This order was later amended to provide for a twelve-month revocation. The State seasonably excepted to the court’s order and the matter was transferred here by Loughlin, C.J.

RSA 262-B:5 IV provides that following a finding that a person is a habitual offender the court shall direct the person not to operate a motor vehicle. The period of revocation is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MullenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  2. State v. BatchelderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API