Moorehouse v. Hammond
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FRICK, J., On August 30, 1922, tbe plaintiff made application in due form to this court for a writ of certiorari" to be directed to the defendant as director of registration requiring the latter to certify up the proceedings in a certain matter in which the defendant, as director of registration, made and entered an order in which he revoked and annulled the license theretofore granted and issued to the plaintiff to practice medicine and surgery in this state, which order the plaintiff alleged to be in excess of the defendant’s jurisdiction, and for that reason should be set aside. The writ…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matter of EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- City of New Orleans v. SteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Tooele City v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roe v. LundstromUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. Hyde, City MarshalUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1967