Legal Opinion
State v. Nielsen
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1967No. 10342Published
1Opinion of the Court
19 Utah 2d 66 (1967)
426 P.2d 13
THE STATE OF UTAH, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
v.
HAROLD NIELSEN AND JANE BAXTER, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
No. 10342.
Supreme Court of Utah.
March 28, 1967.
Olson & Hoggan, Logan, for appellants.
Phil L. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, David R. Daines, Logan, for respondent.
ELLETT, Justice:
The defendants appeal from a conviction of "conspiring to commit an act for the obstruction of justice or the due administration of the laws, in that the defendants did conspire to obtain and procure a dismissal of the case of the State of Utah v. Vincent Guercio, by defendant,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Musser v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- City & County of Denver v. LynchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.