Legal Opinion

State v. Flanders

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1969No. 6926SC18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

•' Defendant’s court-appointed counsel brings forward no assignment of error, frankly stating that he is unable to find error but asks the court to carefully review the record and grant such relief as may be proper.

An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. State v. Ruffin, 3 N.C. App. 307, 164 S.E. 2d 503, citing 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152.

We have carefully reviewed the record before us' and find that the defendant was charged upon a valid bill of indictment, entered a plea of guilty to a lesser…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HopperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. RuffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API