Legal Opinion

State v. Hopper

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1967No. 165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s only assignment of error is that the prison sentences imposed constituted cruel and unusual punishment. Upon his pleas of guilty, he could have been given a total of forty years’ imprisonment for the forgery and uttering of the two checks. G.S. 14-119 and G.S. 14-120.

With a record of two felony convictions in which, so far as the present record shows, he received no active prison sentences, he could hardly hope for further slap-on-the-wrist treatment by the Court. The sentences pronounced herein, while severe, amount to only about a third of the time of imprisonment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. FlandersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API