Joe Ballard v. Arch Insurance Company and Transforce Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost,
Chief Justice
This is an appeal of a summary judgment in favor of.an employer and- a workers’ compensation carrier. The employee suffered a compensable injury to his left eye. The employee claimed the injury aggravated his pre-existing glaucoma and sought compensation for vision loss associated with glaucoma. In this appeal we are presented with questions about the qualifications of the designated doctor, and whether or not the record contains fact issues regarding the extent of the employee’s injury, the employee’s daté of maximum medical improvement (MMI), and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lopez v. Ensign U.S. Southern Drilling, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Marta Diaz, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- ACE American Insurance Company v. Clayton D. Elmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2020
- American Zurich Insurance Company v. Daniel Samudio, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Anthony Whitehurst v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.